64x32 teraton heavies for an ISDII puts out 2.05 petatons, so ~28x the firepower of an ISD's turbolasers. Optimum forward dorsal arc: 38.1 petatons. Total throw weight of heavies, 56.8 petatons. Based on that, I'm currently plotting out a fit of the following for this ship:Ģ2 400 teraton superheavies in (11 twin mounts)ġ92 ISDI-class 170 teraton heavies (48 quad mounts) - you can see the first of these turrets in this updateģ84 40-teraton heavies in octuples (x48) - again, I've put down the first battery of 32.ħ2% dorsal mounted, 28% ventral by throw weight. I'm calling superheavies in the 200+ teraton range. I am using Remnant's 'calibres' of 32 teratons/heavy shot for the heavies on an ISDII, getting ~170 teratons for an ISDI from the heavy guns. I've put some thought into the armament, which starts to appear in these updates. Plus, stylistically, there will definitely be a very large reactor bulb, and probably a secondary bulb. All of which leaves greater proportional space for power generation, and structural stiffening for a large gun battery and high-powered engines. Maybe 24 squadrons worth with a 3 legion formation of stormtroopers, more infantry than heavy vehicles. There will be relatively little in the way of hangars or intervention troops. Not sure if I want to call this Praetor/Procurator or give it a new class name, which would probably be HIMS Warrior or Thunderer if I did.Īs for power generation, I'm thinking 30x ISD equivalents, based on 20x ISD volume and greater emphasis on fleet/ship-to-ship engagement.
Probably would qualify as a battlecruiser or battleship on the Old Republic scale.
I'm VERY loosely basing it off this silhouette:, just bigger.ĭefinitely heavy star cruiser class if Executor and Imperator bookend the range at star dreadnought and flotilla destroyer. The comparison places the ISD to starboard and back of this ship, so makes it look a bit larger than it is. Using a naive, proportional scale up, this ship is ~20x the volume of an Imperator.
0 kommentar(er)
